The Hyacinth macaw is the largest parrot in the world and these big beauties have a large toothless beak that can break open the hardest nuts in the world (even a coconut). Unfortunately these friendly macaws are vulnerable and expensive to buy because of it but that has not stopped it from being one of my favourite animals.
What I loved about them is their gentle personality, deep cobalt blue feathers and regal appearance. The first picture I did tried to link them to the hyacinth plant.
This first picture has the beautiful bird out in the garden, a patch of pink hyacinths in the background and a binky ball toy next to the bird. It was not one of my best pictures but I am happy with how I captured the bird and the background was slightly better than my nesting Blue throated macaws in my opinion. If I was to improve it I would of had the bird play with the toy and maybe more dark greens to get away from the bright dreamy feel of the background.
This is my second attempt at the bird. This time I tried to base the background from a previous picture in a book I looked at. I love this picture more as the bird is bigger on the page and is excited (shown by the raised feathers on the head). If I was to do it again I would have used a pastel to achieve the background as the black was quite grainy on the paper.
The blue Indian peacock have captivated people for centuries. In his native country he is the steed of the God of war, kartikeya (to the worshipers of Shiva) and he is known as mayura in sanskrit, meaning “killer of snakes”.
It is not only India who has fabled the peacock as Westerns commonly used it in their design of the phoenix, the Chinese the Fenghuang’s tail. But Ancient Greeks linked the whole bird to the goddess Hera. In their version of the peacock’s origin, it was from her servant Argus (who was a many eyed cyclops), that the peacock had eyes on it’s train.
It happened through her trying to protect a cow from Zeus by having Argus watch the beast. But Zeus wanted her (like he did with many woman, much to his wife’s dislike) and Gods like him normally got what they wanted in those tales. He got to her by ordering Hermes to slay Argus, on which he succeeded with a stone and the dead giant’s eyes were then placed onto the peacock’s train by Hera. Thus that’s how they interpreted the peacock strange eye spots.
In my free time at College, I did my own peacock watercolour. I tried to get away from a blue sky as the head would not have stood out that much, so I did a bright sunny gold sky (the suns rays through the foliage).
I was happy about this picture as it looked like a peacock and although it was my first time with a peacock train, it wasn’t too bad. If I was to do it again I would have done the train better and with shadow and would have had less green at the bottom of the page so it would stand out more. there was a minor mistake with this picture and it was that the blue smudged into the white paper and when I tried to cover it with paint it ripped the surface a little.
I tackled the eyes of the tail by first mapping them out with the blue centre. Then filling in the pale pink of it and then circling the whole eye spots in bright green than dark. I feathered them bright green, than the whole train turquoise before finally adding the dark green feathers.
Birds of paradise have fascinated people for centuries. The birds were originally thought to have come from actual paradise. This was because the westerns got the bird skins with no feet or wings. As they never saw a real living bird; they asked the traders why they had no feet or wings, But they got the birds from another place so they themselves never saw the real birds and so they came up with at tale that dragon believing westerns would believe for many years: that they floated in paradise sipping dew from clouds. This is why they were called bird of paradise.
I had spare time after finishing my final major project at college a few days ago, so I thought I would pass the time doing a watercolour. My Nan’s favourite bird of paradise came to mind and that was the Blue bird of paradise I drew below.
I was quite happy with the blending of the tail plumes but unfortunately there were a few mistakes too. The biggest mistake was the peeling of paper around the eye and chin, this was due to me overworking that area. In the future I need to learn to leave those areas alone and to use masking fluid to keep areas white (like the eye ring on the female).
The original bird called Jewel does not and never has belonged to me and belongs to Blue Sky Studios.
The reason I have chosen to recolour the popular macaw character from the movies series Rio is because I have found that their birds have not represented the bird species they are based on well.
The bird they based their rare blue macaws on was the critically endangered Spix’s macaw. However, many fans have pointed out how the birds resemble Hyacinth macaws more than the Spix.
The Hyacinth, like the cartoon characters, is a solid dark blue and the Spix is pale blue, has a very pale blue head and grey facial patch. Therefore it is understandable why fans point this out. I myself am bothered by this and it is not the only character to be misrepresented as a background Blue and gold did not have a face patch at all.
Below and as the feature image is my correctly recoloured Spix macaw, Jewel.
The bird was easy to draw and took 2 days (one at evening and the next morning for better lighting for the feathers). I drew the body position from a real Spix macaw and then drew it in the style of Jewel from Rio. Overall I am happy with the outcome as it has become a pretty and accurate representation of the real bird in the style of my favourite character from the film and there is nothing I want to change about her. A problem I encountered was that with the colours I had it was really hard to colour in the pale head without it being too turquoise or dark.
One of the best things someone can draw is their or someone else’s pet. But drawing pets is different from drawing normal animals if you want to do it successfully. If it is your pet, it probably doesn’t matter what you do. But as for a commission, you have to do it correctly; think, what does the owner like about their pet. Is it play times, personality or just appearance?
My first picture of my dearly departed budgie, Bailey shows this. The posture seems forced and the face cartoony even though it was based entirely on a photo of him. The picture is bad for a pet portrait as Bailey wasn’t hyperactive so would rarely look like this. So along with the problem of composition the portrait was unsuccessful in portraying a pet.
What I loved about my pet was his personality, he was always listening to you, relaxed, chirping or generally friendly and I tried to capture his friendly nature in my next picture of him.
This picture was successful to me as although it was an average budgie drawing to someone else it reminded me of Bailey. He always was relaxed like this and looking at me while I talked. This is replicated in the portrait.
It is for that reason alone that you have to follow the rule of capturing what someone liked in their pet when drawing them. As without this rule, it is not their pet just a normal animal that looks similar to them.
Some suggestions for other things people may like and what to do because of that are : if they are active, have them interact with something or running and leaping about, if they are curious, have them study a “mysterious object” or if they are beautiful then pose them like some regal beast.
There are times when we take great photographs of our subjects in a variety of poses and there are times when we have that one photo of our subject that is blurred or ruined. I like to draw from my own photographs but when it came to the blue throated macaw I was not very lucky. The bird was behind glass and this blurred all but one image I took That image was spoiled by dirty glass. These birds are rare in zoos, so I could not get another photo anytime soon. But then I thought of something: why don’t I save the image by drawing it instead. This post will show several stages of how I went about “saving” the photograph.
This was the photo I was attempting to rescue, it was of a pair that was trying to be bred by keepers to bring up the population. According to their website the pair was unsuccessful but at least I got to see these beautiful birds in real life (even if they were behind glass). As you can see it wouldn’t make a good photograph because of the dirt/ scratches on the window but the birds themselves are quite clear.
Using my tablet I uploaded my photo onto a free grid maker app called Proportion Grid Maker. You can click on the picture to add or take away lines. I don’t usually use a grid on my pictures but because of artist license I did not want the birds in an enclosure but wanted them in the wild. The way the bird on the right looks over the fence and onto the wood gave me the idea that these birds could be at a nest site looking out from the tree. As a result I wanted the birds placed onto the page correctly so a grid was a way to make sure this happened.
Happy with the grid on the tablet, I proceeded to draw the grid on the page. I used the grid lightly to add the birds in the correct places but did not follow it like law. The lines on my page was not identical to the tablet grid lines so some parts of the bird was inevitably different to the grid maker photo. This was alright as long as the bird was accurately proportioned/sized and placed roughly in the same place. To help with placing the birds’ wings correctly, I drew the outline for the wing feathers.
I carefully erased the grid lines. Using the line from where the bird looked out from the fence from the photo, I created the tree. I looked into many references of nest holes for these birds online. It was very important for it to be nest holes for these birds as they are smaller than some macaws and live in Bolivia, not Brazil like other macaws. I roughly indicated markings on the tree as it is very likely when colouring, that they would be placed differently than the guide.
I then coloured in the tree and background. The tree and background could not be too detailed as they would not be in focus from that distance, so they were quite simple in design, with not extra detail. It took a few colours to get the colour of the tree, mostly reddish browns and greys and the hole itself had beige in it. originally when I did the hole it was too bright so it had to be dulled down by rubbing it out and reapplying it until the tones faded into the background enough. Using the eraser, I also created the patterns on the tree. These greyish and reddish tones were important as they would make the blue and gold birds stand out even more.
6.Although hard to see, I have replaced all my pencil lines now with colour. I always tackle the picture in the same order, the dull tones first then the colourful feathers of the bird. In previous backgroundless portraits, this meant tackling the beak, face and feet before the feathers. But in this picture it was done in the order of tree, sky, skin (feet and face) and beak then finally feathers. These stages are very important to me as it usually takes two days to complete a picture for me. The light where i live, fades significantly in the morning to 10/12 o’clock and this means accuracy with colour becomes difficult. I do not need to pay too much attention to colour for backgrounds and beaks etc. in my pictures as the bird’s feathers are the main focus. So prioritizing the feathers to last, where I will have fresh light and most of the day to focus on the colours is very important to my pictures. I also changed the background foliage as I thought this one suited it more and being less uniform made it more realistic.
Having finished all the background and gray tones of the birds the day before, I now have the whole morning to focus on getting the correct colours for the blue throated macaws. There are multiple layers in these feathers to make them as intense as possible. The gold has three colours and the blue several. If this was a close up I would have had at least three whole layers of colours built up over the entirety of the feathers. Usually the first two are too dull but in this picture the layering it just fine as the birds are further away.
The picture is now finally complete. What I achieved was that the birds had come from a man made environment to the wild and that I had turned a poor photograph into a reasonable art piece. What I need to improve on is backgrounds; the tree and greenery needs a lot more work and it will probably take many art peices before I can successfully create a background with coloured pencils.
When I first started using coloured pencils I was very young and did not feel the need to read up on how to use them. As a result there were many problems with the art pieces; I will be addressing some of them in this post. These are easy mistakes and hopefully this post will help those who are new to the media.
I am going to use two of my own art pieces to help illustrate the issues. The one above is an old piece I did many years ago and there is much to improve with it.
The biggest problem with this piece is that I have not rubbed out the pencil outline. Why’s this an issue? It is an issue because not only does it stand out and is unrealistic as no animal has a bold outline real life , but if you were to colour the picture the coloured pencil is likely to mix with the graphite in the pencil. This would result in an unwanted muddy colour.
A second problem is that I have not placed the subject in the correct place on the page. Rules in composition state that if you are doing a scene you should have the subject in one quarter of the picture (top or bottom). That would allow the viewer’s eye to wonder through the background as well as looking at the subject. However, this would not apply to an average portrait like this. the average portrait is often situated in the center of the page, some say there should be a space at the bottom so it does not appear to drop off the page but In my opinion that depends on the picture.
A third issue that I continued to do with many of my pieces is labeling it in big words on the paper. This usually is not needed but if you really need to label your work there are many tasteful ways to do so. Some of my favourites include: having it written neatly and small placed few centimeters near the corner the work at the bottom of the page and having a mount on the frame that has a piece cut out of it so as to reveal a section of the picture in which the words would sit, it could also be done by sticking the label carefully on the mount.
To help show the difference the next problems can make if fixed, This is one of my newer pieces. The bird is situated well on the page and has no pencil outline. It was originally drawn with a pencil outline but these lines were replaced one by one with coloured pencil before I started to colour in, removing the risk of it blending in with my colouring.
The picture also illustrates how shading can greatly enhance a picture but most of you already know this.
There is one last easy to see issue on my old picture and it is that I tried to capture the detail with the pencil and not the coloured pencil. This is shown where I outlined the feathers on the wings and chest, it not only smudges the graphite into the picture but it looks horrible too. The best thing to do is to do all the detail inside your picture in your coloured pencil even if you have to map them out in pencil then rub them out and replace them with colour before starting your picture.
There is a lot more I have to learn with coloured pencils, But I hope that I have helped some of you with your art by helping you avoid the mistakes I made.